Sign in
AP

Air Products & Chemicals, Inc. (APD)·Q3 2025 Earnings Summary

Executive Summary

  • Q3 FY25: Revenue $3.02B (+1% YoY) and adjusted EPS $3.09; both exceeded S&P Global consensus (EPS $2.99; revenue $2.99B). GAAP EPS was $3.24, aided by gains on asset sales, partially offset by activism costs and updated project exit charges . Consensus values from S&P Global.*
  • Beat/miss context: APD beat on EPS by ~$0.10 and on revenue by ~$0.03B; adjusted operating income was flat YoY as higher on-sites, non-helium pricing and lower costs offset LNG divestiture, helium weakness, and project exits . Consensus values from S&P Global.*
  • Guidance: FY25 adjusted EPS narrowed to $11.90–$12.10 (midpoint unchanged vs Q2) and Q4 adjusted EPS guided to $3.27–$3.47; FY25 capex maintained at ~ $5B .
  • Near-term catalysts: execution on cost savings ($185–$195M annualized run-rate), continued non‑helium pricing, and any partnership announcements to de‑scope the Louisiana blue ammonia project; helium remains a 2025 headwind ($0.55–$0.60 EPS drag) .

What Went Well and What Went Wrong

  • What Went Well

    • Adjusted EPS $3.09 exceeded guidance ($2.90–$3.00) and beat consensus; CEO: “solid results… exceeded guidance” with “positive base business” and cost productivity . Consensus value from S&P Global.*
    • Segment execution: Asia and Europe operating income grew 8% and 10% YoY, respectively, on productivity and non‑helium pricing; adjusted EBITDA rose 3% YoY .
    • Cost discipline: program on track to deliver $185–$195M annual savings; management is “investing to bring additional AI and digital transformation tools” to enhance productivity .

  • What Went Wrong

    • Volume headwinds: Company volumes -4% YoY driven by the Sept-2024 LNG divestiture (-2%), lower global helium demand, and project exits; Americas volumes -6% .
    • Helium: CFO highlighted helium EPS down ~4% YoY in Q3 and a full-year EPS headwind of ~$0.55–$0.60 (4–5%); teams are balancing price/volume amid the down-cycle .
    • Residual charges/one-timers: Q3 included $24M business & asset action charge ($0.07/sh), $25M activism costs ($0.08/sh); GAAP EPS also reflected gains from asset sales ($0.23 and $0.11/sh) .

Financial Results

Headline metrics by quarter

MetricQ1 2025Q2 2025Q3 2025
Revenue ($USD Billions)$2.93 $2.92 $3.02
GAAP Diluted EPS (Cont. Ops)$2.77 ($7.77) $3.24
Adjusted EPS ($)$2.86 $2.69 $3.09
Adjusted EBITDA ($USD Billions)$1.191 $1.167 $1.310

Q3 vs S&P Global consensus

MetricConsensusActualΔ
EPS ($)2.99*3.09 +0.10
Revenue ($B)2.99*3.02 +0.03

Consensus values from S&P Global.*

Segment performance (Q3 FY25 vs Q3 FY24)

SegmentSales Q3’25 ($MM)Sales Q3’24 ($MM)Op Inc Q3’25 ($MM)Op Inc Q3’24 ($MM)Op Margin Q3’25YoY Commentary
Americas1,261.0 1,234.7 374.1 391.1 29.7% -200 bps on higher energy pass‑through; helium/project exits headwinds; non‑helium pricing helped
Asia810.0 789.6 216.8 200.1 26.8% +150 bps on productivity/lower maintenance; helium pricing weaker
Europe770.5 693.4 225.2 204.7 29.2% -30 bps; non‑helium pricing and FX favorable
ME & India (Equity Affiliates’ Income)86.0 89.2 ———Down 4% YoY driven by an affiliate in Saudi Arabia
Corporate & Other142.9 235.0 (83.1) (56.9) —LNG sale drove lower sales/greater loss, partly offset by productivity

Other KPIs and notes

  • Price/mix & cost: Total company price +1% (merchant +2%); adjusted operating income flat YoY on base strength offsetting LNG divestiture, helium, and exits .
  • Equity affiliates’ income (Consolidated): $167.6MM in Q3’25 vs $168.9MM Q3’24 .
  • D&A: $401.0MM in Q3’25 vs $360.3MM Q3’24 .
  • Cash flow (9M FY25): CFO $1.996B; capex (non‑GAAP definition) $4.003B; FY25 capex outlook ~ $5B .

Guidance Changes

MetricPeriodPrevious GuidanceCurrent GuidanceChange
Adjusted EPSFY2025$11.85–$12.15 (Q2 guide) $11.90–$12.10 Narrowed range; midpoint unchanged
Adjusted EPSQ4 FY2025—$3.27–$3.47 New quarterly guide
Capital ExpendituresFY2025~$5.0B (Q2) ~ $5.0B Maintained
Adjusted EPSFY2025$12.70–$13.00 (Q1) $11.90–$12.10 Lowered vs Q1
Dividend (quarterly)OngoingRaised to $1.79 in Q2 $1.79 declared July 18, 2025 Maintained

Earnings Call Themes & Trends

TopicPrevious Mentions (Q1–Q2 FY25)Current Period (Q3 FY25)Trend
Cost productivity / AICost actions underway; targeted rightsizing and productivity; began outlining headcount reductions and base-business focus Savings program: $185–$195M annual run-rate; expanding AI/digital for energy management and productivity Accelerating execution and specificity
Helium cycleQ2 highlighted helium as a major YoY headwind; down-cycle and mix management Q3: ~4% YoY EPS drag in the quarter; FY headwind ~$0.55–$0.60; expectation of cost re‑pricing over time Persistent headwind but expected to moderate over time
Project portfolio / de‑riskingQ2: exited three U.S. projects; de‑scoping Louisiana (blue ammonia/CCS/ammonia loop partnerships); pause/downstream in Europe pending regulation Q3: still “reasonably optimistic” to secure partners by year-end; reiterates competitiveness, scale benefits; NEOM on track for 2027 start-up (green ammonia) Continued de‑risking with partnership focus
ROCE / leverageQ2: roadmap to high‑teens ROCE by ~2030; cash neutral 2026–2028 target Q3: trailing ROCE ~11.1% impacted by construction-in-progress; ex‑CIP and cash would be +500 bps; reiterate mid–high teens ROCE by 2030 Path reiterated; mechanics clarified
Tariffs/macroQ2: rising tariff uncertainty complicates project procurement and timing Q3: inflation/tariff impacts persist; pricing discipline key to offset Ongoing external headwind
Regional trendsQ2: Americas maintenance costs; Europe pricing; Asia mix Q3: Americas impacted by exited projects and helium; Asia/Europe margins up on productivity and pricing Mixed but improving ex‑helium

Management Commentary

  • CEO Eduardo Menezes: “Adjusted EPS of $3.09 exceeded our guidance… We are staying focused on our cost productivity efforts, pricing, operational excellence and capital discipline.”
  • On productivity and AI: “We expect [AI and digital initiatives in energy management] will significantly change the way we work and open many new productivity opportunities.”
  • On portfolio and growth: “Our objective for the next five years… is to consistently achieve high single-digit or better adjusted EPS growth… [and] operating margins of 30% and ROCE in the mid to high teens by 2030.”
  • On Louisiana blue ammonia: “We are working to get this partnership done by the end of the current year… fundamentals remain very strong.”
  • On helium: “Helium EPS contributions were down about 4% versus prior year. For the full year, we’re anticipating around a $0.55 to $0.60 headwind.”

Q&A Highlights

  • De-scoping Louisiana (blue ammonia/CCS): APD remains optimistic about partnering on CCS and the ammonia loop by year-end; scale supports competitive unit capex; Europe likely to be a competitive end market .
  • Helium: Management framed the cycle as structurally tied to LNG/nat gas; expect price/cost resets to percolate through value chains; aim to manage via cavern storage and pricing discipline .
  • Americas volumes: Decline largely due to World Energy exit and helium demand; underlying on-site and merchant volumes ex‑helium were solid .
  • World Energy headwind: ~$24M one-time contribution in Q3’24; not recurring .
  • Capital allocation/cash: Targeting cash-neutral 2026–2028; share repurchases dependent on deleveraging and cash generation; capex ~ $5B in FY25 .

Estimates Context

  • Q3 FY25 vs consensus: EPS $3.09 vs $2.99; Revenue $3.02B vs $2.99B (beat on both). Consensus values from S&P Global.*
  • Trailing quarters:
    • Q2 FY25: EPS $2.69 vs $2.83; Revenue $2.92B vs $2.93B (miss) . Consensus values from S&P Global.*
    • Q1 FY25: EPS $2.86 vs $2.84; Revenue $2.93B vs $2.94B (in-line/beat on EPS) . Consensus values from S&P Global.*
PeriodEPS Consensus*EPS ActualRevenue Consensus* ($B)Revenue Actual ($B)
Q1 20252.8409*2.86 2.9399*2.9315
Q2 20252.8274*2.69 2.9312*2.9162
Q3 20252.9932*3.09 2.9905*3.0227

Consensus values from S&P Global.*

Key Takeaways for Investors

  • Base business resilience: Non‑helium pricing and productivity offset helium/LNG divestiture headwinds, supporting a Q3 beat and sequential margin recovery; watch for continued pricing traction into Q4 .
  • Cost program is a core driver: $185–$195M annual savings targeted; AI/digital deployment could unlock incremental efficiencies over time .
  • Helium pressure persists in 2025: ~$0.55–$0.60 EPS headwind for FY25 is significant, though management expects cost/pricing realignment to reduce margin impact going forward .
  • Guidance steady on midpoint: FY25 adjusted EPS $11.90–$12.10 and capex ~ $5B reaffirmed; Q4 guide $3.27–$3.47 sets an achievable bar post-Q3 beat .
  • Strategic de-risking: Progress toward partnerships for Louisiana blue ammonia and deferral of European downstream until regulation solidifies reduces capital risk; any partnership announcements are stock catalysts .
  • ROCE trajectory: Near-term ROCE dampened by construction-in-progress; path to mid–high teens by 2030 depends on productivity, capex discipline, and successful commissioning of large projects (NEOM start-up 2027) .
  • Dividend stability: $1.79 quarterly dividend declared (July 18) underscores commitment to cash returns while pursuing portfolio refocus .

Notes:

  • All company figures are from APD’s Q3 FY25 press release and filings unless otherwise noted. Consensus values from S&P Global.* Citations: Q3 FY25 press release and 8‑K ; Q3 call transcript ; Q2 FY25 8‑K and call ; Q1 FY25 8‑K ; Dividend PR (July 18, 2025) .